Ford Kuga 2008 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 14 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Kuga consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |