Ford Kuga 2008 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 48 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Ford Kuga and Kia Sportage are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 564 litres | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 154 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.58 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Ford Kuga has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Sportage, so Ford Kuga quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |