Ford Kuga 2008 vs Hyundai ix35 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 48 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai ix35, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 181 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |