Ford Kuga 2013 vs Kia Sportage 2014

 
Ford Kuga
2013 - 2016
Kia Sportage
2014 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP136 HP
Torque: 340 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds9.8 seconds
Ford Kuga engine produces 27 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Kia Sportage. Despite the higher power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.27.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km7.8 l/100km
By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Kuga consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway950 km on highway
750 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.44 m
Width: 1.84 mno data
Height: 1.70 mno data
Trunk capacity: 456 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1568 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage.
Gross weight (kg): 2`250no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

low
Ford Kuga has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12 20011 400
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Kia Sportage has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv