Ford Kuga 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 27 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga has 51 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |