Ford Kuga 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 13 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Kuga has 51 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |