Ford Kuga 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 13 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 159 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 87 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Tiguan, so Volkswagen Tiguan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |