Ford Kuga 2013 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Koleos. Despite less power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga and Renault Koleos are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1380 litres | |
| Ford Kuga has 6 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 188 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |