Ford Kuga 2013 vs Renault Koleos 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 13 HP more power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Koleos. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga and Renault Koleos are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | no data | |
| Ford Kuga has 6 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |