Ford Kuga 2013 vs Opel Antara 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Kuga) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Opel Antara) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 217 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 4 HP less power than Opel Antara, but torque is 123 NM more than Opel Antara. Despite less power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 8.8 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is smaller. Ford Kuga is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1391 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Kuga has 54 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`183 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Opel Antara has
| |