Ford Kuga 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 12 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Kuga consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 49 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Kuga, so Mazda CX-5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |