Ford Kuga 2013 vs Kia Sportage 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 48 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1470 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 4 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 35 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |