Ford Kuga 2013 vs Jeep Compass 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 27 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Ford Kuga consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | no data | |
| Ford Kuga has 2 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |