Ford Kuga 2013 vs Hyundai Tucson 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 22 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 5 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 513 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1503 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 57 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 65 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |