Ford Kuga 2013 vs BMW X1 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga engine produces 20 HP more power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 20 NM more than BMW X1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 5 cm longer than the BMW X1, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1568 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga has 36 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 218 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`250 kg | 2`120 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`692 kg | 1`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 558 kg | 480 kg | |
| Ford Kuga load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than BMW X1. Therefore, Ford Kuga is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| BMW X1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW X1, so BMW X1 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
BMW X1 has
| |