Ford Kuga 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 10 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 16 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 130 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 184 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |