Ford Kuga 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Kuga consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2012: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 49 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Kuga, so Mazda CX-5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |