Ford Kuga 2013 vs Kia Sportage 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 4 HP more power than Kia Sportage, but torque is 90 NM less than Kia Sportage. Despite the higher power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Sportage 2014 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |