Ford Kuga 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2008

 
Ford Kuga
2013 - 2016
Ford Kuga
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP136 HP
Torque: 240 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds10.7 seconds
Ford Kuga 2013 engine produces 14 HP more power than Ford Kuga 2008, but torque is 80 NM less than Ford Kuga 2008.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.76.4
The Ford Kuga 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Kuga 2013 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga 2013 could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1070 km on highway
Ford Kuga 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.44 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.68 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga 2013 is 8 cm longer than the Ford Kuga 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1568 litresno data
Ford Kuga 2013 has more luggage capacity.
Ford Kuga 2013 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga 2008.
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`250no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Ford Kuga 2013 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga 2008 has serious deffects in 250 percent more cases than Ford Kuga 2013, so Ford Kuga 2013 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 4006400
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Ford Kuga has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv