Ford Kuga 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga engine produces 35 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 25 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga has 100 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`959 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |