Ford Kuga 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2008

 
Ford Kuga
2013 - 2016
Ford Kuga
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP136 HP
Torque: 240 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds10.7 seconds
Ford Kuga 2013 is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Kuga 2013 engine produces 14 HP more power than Ford Kuga 2008, but torque is 80 NM less than Ford Kuga 2008. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.4
Ford Kuga 2013 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga 2013 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1070 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.44 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.68 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga 2013 is 8 cm longer than the Ford Kuga 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1568 litresno data
Ford Kuga 2013 has more luggage capacity.
Ford Kuga 2013 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga 2008.
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`100no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Ford Kuga 2013 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga 2008 has serious deffects in 250 percent more cases than Ford Kuga 2013, so Ford Kuga 2013 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 4006400
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Ford Kuga has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv