Ford Kuga 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.9 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1603 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 94 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 274 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |