Ford Kuga 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1603 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 94 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 274 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`605 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 495 kg | 720 kg | |
| Ford Kuga load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 45 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |