Ford Kuga 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 242 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 394 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga 2017 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Kuga 2017 engine produces 92 HP more power than Ford Kuga 2013, whereas torque is 154 NM more than Ford Kuga 2013. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.7 | |
|
The Ford Kuga 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga 2017 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga 2017 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga 2017 and Ford Kuga 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1653 litres | 1568 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga 2017 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga 2013. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |