Ford Kuga 2016 vs Hyundai Tucson 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 35 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Hyundai Tucson 2015 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 5 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 513 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1603 litres | 1503 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 57 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai Tucson has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Hyundai Tucson, so Hyundai Tucson quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |