Ford Kuga 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1603 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 47 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Ford Kuga has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda CX-5, so Ford Kuga quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |