Ford Kuga 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1603 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`143 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |