Ford Kuga 2016 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.1 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1603 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`230 kg | 2`600 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`716 kg | 1`863 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 514 kg | 737 kg | |
| Ford Kuga load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 43 procentiem less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Discovery Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |