Ford Kuga 2016 vs Audi Q3 2019

 
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Audi Q3
2019 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 370 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds9.2 seconds
Ford Kuga and Audi Q3 have the same engine power, but Ford Kuga torque is 30 NM more than Audi Q3. Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.9
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Kuga consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1330 km on highway
Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.50 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.69 m1.56 m
Ford Kuga is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q3, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1603 litres530 litres
Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 74 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 1073 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2302`155
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Audi Q3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 40030 600
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Audi Q3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv