Ford Kuga 2016 vs Audi Q3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga and Audi Q3 have the same engine power, but Ford Kuga torque is 30 NM more than Audi Q3. Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.4 | |
| Ford Kuga consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q3, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1603 litres | 530 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 1073 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`230 kg | 2`155 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`716 kg | 1`580 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 514 kg | 575 kg | |
| Ford Kuga load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Audi Q3. Therefore, Audi Q3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 32 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |