Ford Kuga 2008 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 14 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.7 | |
| Ford Kuga consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |