Ford Kuga 2016 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 18 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1603 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 159 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 32 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |