Ford Kuga 2016 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Ford Kuga engine produces 2 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, but torque is 25 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Despite the higher power, Ford Kuga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Kuga engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1603 litres | 1756 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 121 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 153 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |