Ford Kuga 2016 vs Ford Kuga 2013

 
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2018
Ford Kuga
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 182 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds10.7 seconds
Ford Kuga 2016 is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Kuga 2016 engine produces 32 HP more power than Ford Kuga 2013, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Kuga 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.47.7
Ford Kuga 2016 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga 2013, which means that by driving the Ford Kuga 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway950 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 300'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years4 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.52 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.69 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga 2016 and Ford Kuga 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres456 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1603 litres1568 litres
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga 2016 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga 2013.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2002`250
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 15 80012 000
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Ford Kuga has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv