Ford Kuga 2016 vs Honda CR-V 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 189 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford Kuga and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Ford Kuga torque is 51 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.5 | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 6 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 497 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 41 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`130 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Kuga, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 18 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |