Ford Kuga 2016 vs Honda CR-V 2017

 
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Honda CR-V
2017 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM189 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Ford Kuga and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Ford Kuga torque is 51 NM more than Honda CR-V.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.5
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Kuga consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.59 m
Width: 1.84 m1.85 m
Height: 1.69 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 6 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres497 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1110 litres
Honda CR-V has more luggage space.
Ford Kuga has 41 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`130
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Kuga, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 13 00018 600
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv