Ford Kuga 2016 vs Subaru XV 2017

 
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Subaru XV
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM196 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.6 seconds
Ford Kuga and Subaru XV have the same engine power, but Ford Kuga torque is 44 NM more than Subaru XV.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.1
Real fuel consumption: 10.6 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Subaru XV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Kuga consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
560 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Subaru XV gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 320'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years14 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Subaru Forester
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru XV might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.47 m
Width: 1.84 m1.80 m
Height: 1.69 m1.62 m
Ford Kuga is larger.
Ford Kuga is 6 cm longer than the Subaru XV, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres385 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1290 litres
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity.
Ford Kuga has 71 litres more trunk space than the Subaru XV.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.5 metres less than that of the Subaru XV, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`940
Safety:
The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 15 80021 200
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • timing belt engine
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Subaru XV has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv