Ford Kuga 2016 vs Subaru XV 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga and Subaru XV have the same engine power, but Ford Kuga torque is 44 NM more than Subaru XV. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru XV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Kuga consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru XV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru XV might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Subaru XV 2012 2.0 engine: The Subaru EJ204 is a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter boxer engine producing around 150–160 hp, widely used in models such as Impreza, Legacy, and Forester between 1999 and 2015. It is generally regarded as a durable engine, but like many units from the EJ ... More about Subaru XV 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 7 cm longer than the Subaru XV, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1270 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga has 76 litres more trunk space than the Subaru XV. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.5 metres more than that of the Subaru XV, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Subaru XV scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Subaru XV has
| |