Ford Kuga 2016 vs Opel Grandland 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Ford Kuga and Opel Grandland have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.3 | |
The Opel Grandland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Kuga consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Grandland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
Ford Kuga is 5 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 514 litres | |
Opel Grandland has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 58 litres less trunk space than the Opel Grandland. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.05 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.049999999999999 metres more than that of the Opel Grandland. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | high | |
Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 13 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Opel Grandland has
| |