Ford Kuga 2016 vs Opel Grandland 2017

 
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Opel Grandland
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP130 HP
Torque: 240 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.1 seconds
Ford Kuga engine produces 20 HP more power than Opel Grandland, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Opel Grandland.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.05.4
Real fuel consumption: 10.6 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Opel Grandland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Kuga consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Grandland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga could require 390 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Kuga consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Grandland.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
560 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Opel Grandland gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 320'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years11 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Grandland might be a better choice in this respect.
Opel Grandland 2017 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ...  More about Opel Grandland 2017 1.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.48 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.69 m1.61 m
Ford Kuga is 5 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres514 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1652 litres
Opel Grandland has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 58 litres less trunk space than the Opel Grandland. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Grandland, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`930
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Opel Grandland has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12 400no data
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Opel Grandland has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv