Ford Kuga 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Ford Kuga engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
560 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
Ford Kuga is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 135 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Kuga has 321 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`210 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 16 000 | 12 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |