Ford Kuga 2016 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Ford Kuga 2016 and Ford Kuga 2013 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.7 | |
| Ford Kuga 2016 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Kuga 2016 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga 2016 and Ford Kuga 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga 2016 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga 2013. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Kuga has
| |