Ford Kuga 2008 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 200 HP | 110 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | 7.4 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.3 | 5.3 - 9.9 | |
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Tiguan. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`130 | ~ 2`189 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |