Ford Kuga 2008 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 200 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Kuga are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Qashqai. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.3 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1513 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`130 kg | ~ 1`985 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`847 kg | ~ 1`453 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 283 kg | ~ 532 kg | |
| Ford Kuga load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is almost two times less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |