Ford Kuga 2008 vs Kia Sportage 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 200 HP | 115 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 165 - 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | 9.8 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.3 | 5.7 - 9.2 | |
|
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Sportage. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga and Kia Sportage are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1547 litres | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 330 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Ford Kuga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`130 | ~ 2`064 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |