Ford Kuga 2008 vs BMW X3 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Kuga
2008 - 2013
BMW X3
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ford Kuga is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X3 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Kuga also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 136 - 200 HP143 - 286 HP
Torque: 320 NM200 - 580 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 - 10.7 seconds6.6 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 10.36.2 - 10.0
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.57 m
Width: 1.84 m1.85 m
Height: 1.68 m1.67 m
Ford Kuga is smaller, but slightly higher.
Ford Kuga is 13 cm shorter than the BMW X3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1560 litres
BMW X3 has more luggage space.
Ford Kuga has 70 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`130~ 2`289
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 72006800
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
BMW X3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv