Ford Kuga 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Kuga
2013 - 2016
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)1.4 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, lPG)

Performance

Power: 140 - 182 HP110 - 140 HP
Torque: 230 - 340 NM155 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 - 11.2 seconds9.4 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 7.74.7 - 7.9
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Mokka. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.28 m
Width: 1.84 m1.77 m
Height: 1.69 m1.67 m
Ford Kuga is larger.
Ford Kuga is 25 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1568 litres1372 litres
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity.
Ford Kuga has 100 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 196 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`213~ 1`929
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 12 2009600
Pros and Cons: Ford Kuga has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
Opel Mokka has
  • petrol, diesel and LPG engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv