Ford Kuga 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 182 HP | 110 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 230 - 340 NM | 155 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | 9.4 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 7.7 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Mokka. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
Ford Kuga is larger. Ford Kuga is 25 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 356 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1372 litres | |
Ford Kuga has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga has 100 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 196 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`213 | ~ 1`929 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Average price (€): | 11 400 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |