Ford Kuga 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 182 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 340 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga is 4 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 133 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`213 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |