Ford Kuga 2013 vs Kia Sportage 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 182 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 340 NM | 164 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | 9.8 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 7.7 | 5.2 - 8.5 | |
|
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Sportage. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 8 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 108 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`213 | ~ 1`952 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |