Ford Kuga 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 182 HP | 136 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 7.7 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
|
Ford Kuga 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga 2008. On average, Ford Kuga 2013 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Kuga 2013 is 8 cm longer than the Ford Kuga 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Kuga 2013 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1568 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Kuga 2013 has more luggage capacity. Ford Kuga 2013 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga 2013 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga 2008, which means Ford Kuga 2013 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`213 | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |