Ford Kuga 2016 vs Opel Grandland 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Opel Grandland is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 242 HP | 120 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | 6.1 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 4.0 - 7.3 | |
|
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Grandland. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Grandland. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 5 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Kuga is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 514 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1653 litres | 1652 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Kuga has 58 litres less trunk space than the Opel Grandland. This could mean that the Ford Kuga uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 1 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Grandland, which means Ford Kuga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`207 | ~ 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Opel Grandland has
| |