Ford Kuga 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 242 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Ford Kuga petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Ford Kuga equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Kuga is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Kuga is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1653 litres | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Ford Kuga has 94 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 329 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Kuga is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`207 | ~ 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Kuga has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |